Ciao Sarath Thanks for the detailed post. I do appreciate the time and care you took!
I am sure specific extensions on Github fitted to a specific community is neat, as in your example. But that needs BESPOKE spec and building. Off-the-shelf Github it is not, IMO, and other (GH dev) posters here, don't find GH at all suited to open discussion & exploration because it's primarily about code development/management. My thoughts TT On Sunday, 10 May 2020 20:48:59 UTC+2, Sarath Addanki wrote: > > Ciao TiddlyTweeter, > > Github is more than code management. It's used for project management, > defects board, discussions, Devops, Wiki. > > Kindly look into this example to understand my view point, > > For example, neovim is one of the most community contributed repository. ( > https://github.com/neovim/neovim/) If you look at how it's organized(plz > see below some pics), and understand why it has a great success in it's own > community then we may replicate similar success model. > [image: 2020-05-10_13-08-38.png] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Above pic: 1) - 524 contributors 2) 15k commits in ~ 2.5yr span(i think) > > [image: 2020-05-10_13-09-21.png] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Above pic: 1) Documentation link 2) *Quick help to new and existing users > is provided via gitter.im <https://gitter.im/neovim/neovim> chat > functionality *3) Social communication > > [image: 2020-05-10_13-05-04.png] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Above pic, *One example of a issue where a discussion occurs. 70 comments > on this*. In that issue discussion, If anyone likes other view point, > they can like the comments by adding smileys, refer other opened issues and > so on. > > Apart from this example, I have used other projects in github and whenever > I need a help I open an issue there and I get help. And I will also know if > a fix(needed) was implemented related to my issue or not. > > thanks! > > > > > On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 5:52:13 AM UTC-4, TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Births wrote: >> >>> ... I am not sure than everyone creating adaptations and plugins even >>> are on github ... If the interesting stuff leaves this group, people will >>> leave the group but not necessarily to go on github. >> >> >> Ste Wilson wrote: >>> >>> I don't get git hub...i keep trying... But.. Commits. Pr.. Fork.. Wtf... >>> And it all seems very formal.. Not sure April McEnzie of London, >>> Newfoundland would approve either! Which is to say I'm not sure threads >>> like tiddly smile would be created on git hub. >> >> >> Ciao Steve & Birthe >> >> Right! >> >> At base is ONE place. IF we could get here to work for finding HISTORY >> we'd be fine. >> >> I suspect the solution is (a) mainly technical; (b) slight change in >> posting behaviour (maybe enforced tagging?) Dunno. >> >> The last thing I'd think good would be yet more fragmentation on >> "relevance detection". >> >> GitHub is good. But its NOT a discussion forum. Totally WRONG for that. >> Its primarily a code management system. >> >> Best wishes >> TT >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4851607c-8bb1-4ffa-af05-50e3b46e938b%40googlegroups.com.
