Riz wrote: > > May be TW5 can offer an edition where wikitext markup mimic the markdown > syntax. It won't be hard, a few regex changes in 20-25 parser tiddlers. > That way new users don't have to deal with learning a new markup. If they > do not intend to dive deep to use widgets and macros and all, they can > simply stick to using just what they want. >
Maybe, and it is worth exploring. I'm very curious about it but I suspect the combo of "limited" but not "specialized" would not bring anything useful. I.e it would then be an odd behaving editor where you can style your text. What would people *do* with it? What is it *for*? In my "syntax idea collection thread <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/12ZdpPBbBNg/tvsbeaCuCgAJ>" I posted that it would be an improvement if widgets were embedded into macros to spare the users from seeing the complex looking widget syntax. If users accepts using macros they'd have infinitely more power than mere markdown. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7cc7a473-59d2-48fa-945c-eda4e01a2202%40googlegroups.com.
