TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Mat wrote (lightly edited by me)... >> >> >> Can I ask what makes you ... stick with TWC instead of switching to TW5? >> What is it that you and the TWC community sees that Jeremy did not see when >> he *evidently *said that TWC is not a good enough system and it needs a >> complete revamp? >> > > I think that is a category error. Mixing up future changes with current > perfectly good function. >
So maybe the question should go to the chief architect, i.e why he evidently did not think it was "a perfectly good solution". If the planned discussion between Yakov and Jeremy takes place, I hope this topic could be discussed. What's possible, what is not possible with the two systems. Why it makes sense to abandon TWC and why it makes sense to have it stick around. BTW, I hope this can be discussed without feelings. Feelings are *totally *irrelevant to this and - if anything - can be detrimental to the issue. If you come to a new software you don't want praises for it because "we have invested so much money/feelings/sweat into it", you want to know what it can *do *for you. How good it is. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3144318a-0f4a-41c5-b4ea-98396e516171%40googlegroups.com.
