> Yakov - interesting to read. > Can I ask what makes you, personally, stick with TWC instead of switching > to TW5? >
Well, that's quite simple: first, it's migration that's basically impossible (too many extensions, too much content, no tools for gradual migration like TW5 with formatter from TWC or mixed formatter and no docs to migrate extensions). Let be honest, this first reason is enough, I can't estimate others effectively. But also TW5 has design which is not nice for desktop, higher learning curve (or at least I have to learn more than I expected to just create a simple aggregated list or a simple plugin etc). May be there were other reasons, I don't remember. What is it that you and the TWC community sees that Jeremy did not see when > he *evidently *said that TWC is not a good enough system and it needs a > complete revamp? > Well, I've tried to figure what are the main architecture differences and asked about that 2 or 3 times but never got any detailed answer. TWC architecture has some flaws, but don't consider any of them unrepairable. The question as you put it doesn't seem to be quite correct. > So no misunderstanding: This is a totally fair question, asked because I > really would like to know. I was once a TWC user (I started with TW in > 2006/7 so...) and loved it but after having started with TW5 I'm not even > considering going back. Yes, there are a few bits that we don't have in TW5 > but there is a ton of stuff that we don't have in TWC. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dc40dc94-3258-49a6-844f-af5b7f4216ed%40googlegroups.com.
