Mark S. wrote: > > After splitting into your 4000 pieces, how was performance for additional, > normal splits? >
Bad. S l o o o o w. TBH if I did it again and the splitter were so equipped it could split on "^\s*CHAPTER" then it might work. There are 50 chapters so its about 80 paras per chapter.. Seems well workable. > > If there's a serious split problem, then the question is, do we: > > 1. Advise people to stick with shorter documents > Yes. But, long term we should maybe look at Dynaview (the e-pub version of TW uses it brilliantly) to see if it could help? > 2. Use some other mechanism for ordering the tiddlers > > A simple ordering system would be to have a field, "sortby". Then on the > first split you would have > > 001. > 002. > 003. > > and then an additional split at 002. might look like > > 001. > 002.001 > 002.002 > 003. > > and after 002.001. : > > 001. > 002.001 > 002.001.001 > 002.001.002 > 002.002 > 003. > > Obviously this field could get quite long. > > The main reason I didn't pursue this path was because I was thinking about > outlining. For outlining, it needs to be easy to traverse up and down > (actually more "up") a chain of tiddlers. The list filter operators built > into TW allow you to do that. > IMO the simplicity of your tag approach is right. Its working well. Mega-huge novels I don't think is typical. Maybe I need test a bit more, but what I experienced so far is perfectly workable. > > I'm assuming that the greater utility of an outliner/editor makes any > performance hit worthwhile, but I guess it will be easier to judge that > when I post the outlner tw. > > I can post it now, but important pieces are unfinished. In particular, > when you split, the new tiddlers aren't assigned a level and fold status, > and so disappear. The interface isn't using standard icons. But if you want > to have a peak: > > https://marxsal.github.io/various/notowritey-outliner.html > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fmarxsal.github.io%2Fvarious%2Fnotowritey-outliner.html&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGtpdYr-cU1C0YITPjOYLsfck0sTw> > > Click on the "hamburg" to change levels. Click on the fold/unfold symbols > to change fold status. > > There's a tool tiddler for converting existing documents into outline > documents (just adds level and fold fields). > Thanks. I will take a look. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/63c527a0-8b04-404b-89ad-043a01719cec%40googlegroups.com.
