In case anyone's interested, I have some updated versions of my plugins 
going at https://clutterstack.github.io/can-tw/workshop/.

It's a never-ending evolution, breaking and fixing and tweaking, but I 
thought I'd share an imperfect public wiki. The latest version of Omni 
addresses some of David Gifford's notes: hiding of the toolbar that changes 
modes, and more sensible placeholder text. I also fixed whole-tiddler 
folding for omnibuses, which I had broken and then neglected for a long 
time. 

Cheers,
Chris
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 3:56:02 PM UTC-4 David Gifford wrote:

> Thanks Chris! Look forward to seeing how this develops.
>
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 1:32:58 PM UTC-6 clutterstack wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Wow, I'd better have a look at how this plugin has changed since August. 
>> Thanks so much for your thoughtful feedback! 
>>
>> ...It hasn't changed on github, but locally the Omnibus plugin has had a 
>> lot of work under the hood; maybe not as much superficially. As often 
>> happens, I had intended to update the public version frequently, but life 
>> has kept me busy and my own modifications rarely seem quite ready to share 
>> and document. "Another one bites the dust" was never meant to stay up. Heh. 
>> It's still there in my local wikis.
>>
>> I prefer the title input field beneath the text, because if I'm adding 
>> within an omnibus I usually don't want to bother with a title -- and if I 
>> do, often the title comes to me only after I've written its contents. But 
>> the input fields should certainly identify themselves clearly. This layout 
>> is specified in my "Quick" plugin,
>>
>> The current (my local) version has a tiddler tagged "$:/tags/ViewTemplate" 
>> to display the Omnibus stuff after the body on tiddlers tagged "omnibus", 
>> and I have not repaired the effect that has on folding of the whole tiddler 
>> (i.e. it doesn't fold). That's on my list of things to fix, but it's after 
>> a lot of other issues that get in the way of my using my wikis. There's a 
>> snowplow effect of annoyances that don't stop the plugin from functioning 
>> that I've really ignored -- as with the "omnibus" tag, which just hasn't 
>> bothered me enough to clean up...yet.
>>
>> Incidentally, nearer the start of this odyssey I really wasn't sure to 
>> what extent I wanted to use tags vs. custom fields, in general. Did I want 
>> to use several categories of tags, and have some hidden? Did I want lots of 
>> custom fields? I've become much more comfortable with the idea of adding 
>> fields to tiddlers.
>>
>> As for putting the omnibus-mode icons in the sidebar, certainly that must 
>> be doable. I do sometimes have more than one omni open, in different modes 
>> (one may be under intensive construction, another could be just for 
>> reading, and another a todo list). On my current wikis, only the top 
>> omnibus shows the mode-selection icons and sub-omnis follow its setting, so 
>> it's less cluttered. I can see the desirability of cleaning the interface 
>> for publishing read-only omnis. Maybe a view-mode toolbar button to toggle 
>> the mode icons? Then it could be per-tiddler.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:51:47 AM UTC-4 David Gifford wrote:
>>
>>> Hi clutterstack
>>>
>>> Here are my reactions:
>>>
>>> 1. That export tab is a stroke of genius! Time saver for exporting 
>>> multiple-but-not-all tiddlers.
>>> 2. That drag tags tab is also a stroke of genius. I don't use tags that 
>>> much, but that is a great idea.
>>> 3. It took me a while to figure out that effectively, the Another one 
>>> bites the dust is the text field editor and the Title is the title editor. 
>>> I am so used to seeing title on top and text below. And since they are 
>>> headers, that reinforced my idea that the top was the tiddler title, which 
>>> made me wonder what the title field was for. Not saying you should change 
>>> anything, just letting you know of my confusion. Or perhaps replace Another 
>>> one bites the dust with Text or something that identifies what it is for.
>>> 4. Not a fan of having an omnibus tag for omnibus tiddlers, since that 
>>> might be confusing to viewers if I publish a file online, but I tend to 
>>> hide the tags field in view mode anyway, so it won't affect me.
>>> 5. Amazing that it all comes toghether so well, expand/collapse 
>>> individually or collectively, change editing options or show clean, drag to 
>>> rearrange, add new in the place where you want it. Also the interface is 
>>> not overly invasive/cluttered, and you can hide various elements as needed. 
>>> Great, great job.
>>> 6. Could the three editing options icons be in the sidebar rather than 
>>> at the top of the tiddler? I say this because for publishing a file online, 
>>> whether as static html or as the TiddlyWiki file, those icons are still 
>>> visible in the text and will confuse viewers for whom I just want them to 
>>> focus on the final content produced. I realize you have it set up so each 
>>> subtiddler has the icons for multilevel fine tuned controls, but for 
>>> content creators who want to use it to produce content, the icons are a 
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 7:58:10 AM UTC-6 David Gifford wrote:
>>>
>>>> WOW either this plugin has changed a lot, or I completely forgot seeing 
>>>> this in August. I just played with this and I really like it!
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 3:48:11 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 12:17:18 PM UTC-5 clutterstack wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @David Gifford
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey, I made the big time! ;) Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 8:40:33 AM UTC-4, David Gifford wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't had the chance to play with this, but I added it to the 
>>>>>>> TiddlyWiki Toolmap here: 
>>>>>>> https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM#z=QWdEBqaQUwlcIQVkU4TWTauS.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Looks interesting!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 3:21:39 PM UTC-5 clutterstack wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Following on from my quick adder plugin, I've built a demo of the 
>>>>>>>> reason I wanted the quick-adding capability. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was pretty excited about this, and I guess I still am, although 
>>>>>>>> it converges quite a lot toward Streams and NotoWritey. It's called 
>>>>>>>> Omni, 
>>>>>>>> short for Omnibus, because each one collects tiddler "passengers". 
>>>>>>>> Here's 
>>>>>>>> what I said in the demo are its basic capabilities: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Quickly add tiddlers, without needing to think of a title right 
>>>>>>>> away (or ever)
>>>>>>>> * Rearrange tiddlers within and between omnibuses by drag and drop
>>>>>>>> * Drag and drop to add tiddlers to the omnibus
>>>>>>>> * Add (existing) tags to tiddlers by drag and drop
>>>>>>>> * Set indentation levels or styles for tiddlers within the omnibus
>>>>>>>> * "Fold" and "unfold" tiddler transclusions 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see I Ieft out "edit tiddler text". You can see there's some 
>>>>>>>> overlap, although there are some slightly different decisions among 
>>>>>>>> Streams, NotoWritey, and Omni.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Demo and some notes are available at
>>>>>>>> https://clutterstack.github.io/TW5-omni/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having used this for a bit, I have come to the conclusion it needs 
>>>>>>>> a major reworking under the hood, but there's a lot I will keep. 
>>>>>>>> Certainly, 
>>>>>>>> the fact that I know Streams is much better-written is due to my 
>>>>>>>> having 
>>>>>>>> climbed a learning curve writing this -- I can now read and understand 
>>>>>>>> Saq's code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, although this is not a production-ready plugin, maybe 
>>>>>>>> someone will get an idea or snippet from this. The plugin repo is 
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/clutterstack/TW5-omni.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I plan to incorporate more ways to manipulate and assemble 
>>>>>>>> "omnibuses" into my wiki. My historical problem has been that I can 
>>>>>>>> collect 
>>>>>>>> a lot into a wiki but it's a bit of a black hole after that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Chris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/348d0d0f-080e-4d66-b1af-a947d75f0e10n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to