Good progress! Nice tools!

I see new theme and palette in your new release. It would be great to 
announce them and lets interested user download them separately.

Thank you for sharing Chris!

--Mohammad

On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 11:32:19 PM UTC+3:30 clutterstack wrote:

> In case anyone's interested, I have some updated versions of my plugins 
> going at https://clutterstack.github.io/can-tw/workshop/.
>
> It's a never-ending evolution, breaking and fixing and tweaking, but I 
> thought I'd share an imperfect public wiki. The latest version of Omni 
> addresses some of David Gifford's notes: hiding of the toolbar that changes 
> modes, and more sensible placeholder text. I also fixed whole-tiddler 
> folding for omnibuses, which I had broken and then neglected for a long 
> time. 
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 3:56:02 PM UTC-4 David Gifford wrote:
>
>> Thanks Chris! Look forward to seeing how this develops.
>>
>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 1:32:58 PM UTC-6 clutterstack wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Wow, I'd better have a look at how this plugin has changed since August. 
>>> Thanks so much for your thoughtful feedback! 
>>>
>>> ...It hasn't changed on github, but locally the Omnibus plugin has had a 
>>> lot of work under the hood; maybe not as much superficially. As often 
>>> happens, I had intended to update the public version frequently, but life 
>>> has kept me busy and my own modifications rarely seem quite ready to share 
>>> and document. "Another one bites the dust" was never meant to stay up. Heh. 
>>> It's still there in my local wikis.
>>>
>>> I prefer the title input field beneath the text, because if I'm adding 
>>> within an omnibus I usually don't want to bother with a title -- and if I 
>>> do, often the title comes to me only after I've written its contents. But 
>>> the input fields should certainly identify themselves clearly. This layout 
>>> is specified in my "Quick" plugin,
>>>
>>> The current (my local) version has a tiddler tagged "$:/tags/ViewTemplate" 
>>> to display the Omnibus stuff after the body on tiddlers tagged "omnibus", 
>>> and I have not repaired the effect that has on folding of the whole tiddler 
>>> (i.e. it doesn't fold). That's on my list of things to fix, but it's after 
>>> a lot of other issues that get in the way of my using my wikis. There's a 
>>> snowplow effect of annoyances that don't stop the plugin from functioning 
>>> that I've really ignored -- as with the "omnibus" tag, which just hasn't 
>>> bothered me enough to clean up...yet.
>>>
>>> Incidentally, nearer the start of this odyssey I really wasn't sure to 
>>> what extent I wanted to use tags vs. custom fields, in general. Did I want 
>>> to use several categories of tags, and have some hidden? Did I want lots of 
>>> custom fields? I've become much more comfortable with the idea of adding 
>>> fields to tiddlers.
>>>
>>> As for putting the omnibus-mode icons in the sidebar, certainly that 
>>> must be doable. I do sometimes have more than one omni open, in different 
>>> modes (one may be under intensive construction, another could be just for 
>>> reading, and another a todo list). On my current wikis, only the top 
>>> omnibus shows the mode-selection icons and sub-omnis follow its setting, so 
>>> it's less cluttered. I can see the desirability of cleaning the interface 
>>> for publishing read-only omnis. Maybe a view-mode toolbar button to toggle 
>>> the mode icons? Then it could be per-tiddler.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:51:47 AM UTC-4 David Gifford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi clutterstack
>>>>
>>>> Here are my reactions:
>>>>
>>>> 1. That export tab is a stroke of genius! Time saver for exporting 
>>>> multiple-but-not-all tiddlers.
>>>> 2. That drag tags tab is also a stroke of genius. I don't use tags that 
>>>> much, but that is a great idea.
>>>> 3. It took me a while to figure out that effectively, the Another one 
>>>> bites the dust is the text field editor and the Title is the title editor. 
>>>> I am so used to seeing title on top and text below. And since they are 
>>>> headers, that reinforced my idea that the top was the tiddler title, which 
>>>> made me wonder what the title field was for. Not saying you should change 
>>>> anything, just letting you know of my confusion. Or perhaps replace 
>>>> Another 
>>>> one bites the dust with Text or something that identifies what it is for.
>>>> 4. Not a fan of having an omnibus tag for omnibus tiddlers, since that 
>>>> might be confusing to viewers if I publish a file online, but I tend to 
>>>> hide the tags field in view mode anyway, so it won't affect me.
>>>> 5. Amazing that it all comes toghether so well, expand/collapse 
>>>> individually or collectively, change editing options or show clean, drag 
>>>> to 
>>>> rearrange, add new in the place where you want it. Also the interface is 
>>>> not overly invasive/cluttered, and you can hide various elements as 
>>>> needed. 
>>>> Great, great job.
>>>> 6. Could the three editing options icons be in the sidebar rather than 
>>>> at the top of the tiddler? I say this because for publishing a file 
>>>> online, 
>>>> whether as static html or as the TiddlyWiki file, those icons are still 
>>>> visible in the text and will confuse viewers for whom I just want them to 
>>>> focus on the final content produced. I realize you have it set up so each 
>>>> subtiddler has the icons for multilevel fine tuned controls, but for 
>>>> content creators who want to use it to produce content, the icons are a 
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 7:58:10 AM UTC-6 David Gifford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> WOW either this plugin has changed a lot, or I completely forgot 
>>>>> seeing this in August. I just played with this and I really like it!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 3:48:11 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 12:17:18 PM UTC-5 clutterstack wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @David Gifford
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey, I made the big time! ;) Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 8:40:33 AM UTC-4, David Gifford wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't had the chance to play with this, but I added it to the 
>>>>>>>> TiddlyWiki Toolmap here: 
>>>>>>>> https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM#z=QWdEBqaQUwlcIQVkU4TWTauS.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Looks interesting!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 3:21:39 PM UTC-5 clutterstack wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Following on from my quick adder plugin, I've built a demo of the 
>>>>>>>>> reason I wanted the quick-adding capability. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was pretty excited about this, and I guess I still am, although 
>>>>>>>>> it converges quite a lot toward Streams and NotoWritey. It's called 
>>>>>>>>> Omni, 
>>>>>>>>> short for Omnibus, because each one collects tiddler "passengers". 
>>>>>>>>> Here's 
>>>>>>>>> what I said in the demo are its basic capabilities: 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * Quickly add tiddlers, without needing to think of a title right 
>>>>>>>>> away (or ever)
>>>>>>>>> * Rearrange tiddlers within and between omnibuses by drag and drop
>>>>>>>>> * Drag and drop to add tiddlers to the omnibus
>>>>>>>>> * Add (existing) tags to tiddlers by drag and drop
>>>>>>>>> * Set indentation levels or styles for tiddlers within the omnibus
>>>>>>>>> * "Fold" and "unfold" tiddler transclusions 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I see I Ieft out "edit tiddler text". You can see there's some 
>>>>>>>>> overlap, although there are some slightly different decisions among 
>>>>>>>>> Streams, NotoWritey, and Omni.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Demo and some notes are available at
>>>>>>>>> https://clutterstack.github.io/TW5-omni/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having used this for a bit, I have come to the conclusion it needs 
>>>>>>>>> a major reworking under the hood, but there's a lot I will keep. 
>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 
>>>>>>>>> the fact that I know Streams is much better-written is due to my 
>>>>>>>>> having 
>>>>>>>>> climbed a learning curve writing this -- I can now read and 
>>>>>>>>> understand 
>>>>>>>>> Saq's code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, although this is not a production-ready plugin, maybe 
>>>>>>>>> someone will get an idea or snippet from this. The plugin repo is 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/clutterstack/TW5-omni.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I plan to incorporate more ways to manipulate and assemble 
>>>>>>>>> "omnibuses" into my wiki. My historical problem has been that I can 
>>>>>>>>> collect 
>>>>>>>>> a lot into a wiki but it's a bit of a black hole after that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Chris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b7458a3c-db7a-474d-9fb7-8180f9ae2a8cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to