Ciao Saq Got it! Agreed!
Just want to post resistance to any idea arising everything should go GitHub! TiddlyWikiDev on GG is being retired in favour (correctly) of GH. This group isn't & any idea it should makes no sense. Best wishes TT On Saturday, 12 December 2020 at 15:36:12 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > "For the context that won't help a lot UNLESS general discussion is Dev > highly relevant." > > @TT my comment is meant to facilitate separating the *Dev* discussions on > Github from Issues and PRs. I would expect Issues and PRs to be of greater > urgency, and hence would sort them differently in my inbox. > > On Saturday, December 12, 2020 at 12:59:41 PM UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > >> But Saq. >> >> For the context that won't help a lot UNLESS general discussion is Dev >> highly relevant. >> As far as I can see the general discussion group--vital to end users--is >> NOT dominantly about development of TW. >> Its about optimizing usage. I find it hard to see how GH is relevant to >> that need. >> >> With the (good) move of* TiddlyWikiDev *to GH it will become sensible to >> link to the GH Discussions from general GG posts when RELEVANT. But >> discussing everything on GH seems a very bad idea. >> >> Thoughts >> TT >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/21e61298-1747-47ab-9d65-693fd67e3011n%40googlegroups.com.
