@TT we are in agreement. While Dev discussions on GH are a good move, I already feel the need to manage those notifications better and would not want to clutter them further with non-development related discussions.
On Saturday, December 12, 2020 at 3:44:00 PM UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao Saq > > Got it! Agreed! > > Just want to post resistance to any idea arising everything should go > GitHub! > TiddlyWikiDev on GG is being retired in favour (correctly) of GH. > > This group isn't & any idea it should makes no sense. > > Best wishes > TT > > On Saturday, 12 December 2020 at 15:36:12 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > >> "For the context that won't help a lot UNLESS general discussion is Dev >> highly relevant." >> >> @TT my comment is meant to facilitate separating the *Dev* discussions >> on Github from Issues and PRs. I would expect Issues and PRs to be of >> greater urgency, and hence would sort them differently in my inbox. >> >> On Saturday, December 12, 2020 at 12:59:41 PM UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >>> But Saq. >>> >>> For the context that won't help a lot UNLESS general discussion is Dev >>> highly relevant. >>> As far as I can see the general discussion group--vital to end users--is >>> NOT dominantly about development of TW. >>> Its about optimizing usage. I find it hard to see how GH is relevant to >>> that need. >>> >>> With the (good) move of* TiddlyWikiDev *to GH it will become sensible >>> to link to the GH Discussions from general GG posts when RELEVANT. But >>> discussing everything on GH seems a very bad idea. >>> >>> Thoughts >>> TT >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0f700ca1-023f-454e-9cc0-c83408cf0625n%40googlegroups.com.
