Aside: we could merge the two <$list> filters together as a fun exercise to
reduce the amount of code, but there is nothing wrong with having the two
there as an explicit note to yourself of what you're thinking and how you
got there.
Reducing code/steps is a silly thing to do when those steps are a
visual/explicit reminder or something (i.e. a trail of breadcrumbs!)
On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:46:50 AM UTC-3 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> G'day,
>
> Just focusing on this bit of your code:
>
> <$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
> </$list>
>
> Let's do this:
>
> <$list *variable="thisTiddler" *
> filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
>
> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
> </$list>
>
>
> Now you can use this variable to do all sorts of things inside there. For
> example:
>
>
> <$list variable="thisTiddler"
> filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>*: <$text text={{{
> [regexp<thisTiddler>count[]] }}}/>*
> </$list>
>
> Please note: I've just typed all of the above here without testing/trying
> the code in a TiddlyWiki. So let's say that is just there for discussion's
> sake.
> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 6:25:03 AM UTC-3 0 0 wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>> To generate a list of overdue recurrent tiddlers I'm currently using a
>> nested list so I can compare for each tiddler whether they haven't been
>> interacted with in the period defined for each tiddler (frequency).
>> Something like this:
>>
>> <$list filter="[has[frequency]]">
>> <$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
>> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
>> </$list>
>> </$list>
>>
>> Now due to the second list loop handling only a single title at a time,
>> I'm unable to extract any statistical insights out of this, such as count[]
>> -ing all the overdue tiddlers to calculate their percentage or getting the
>> sum[] of a field value the tiddlers share (e.g. time requirement).
>>
>> Could the overdue filtering process be handled with a single list loop in
>> any way?
>> Or is it perhaps possible to set a variable inside the inner list loop
>> that would additively store the value for each item inside the inner list?
>> Could you suggest any other way to approach this problem?
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>> 0
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/318184c7-ba4f-47a6-ae54-5baad6443826n%40googlegroups.com.
