Hi, give this a spin:
<$list filter="[has[frequency]]">
*<$vars theCount={{{ [all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}count[]]
}}} >*
<$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
<$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
</$list>
*You have <$text text=<<theCount>>/>*
*</$vars>*
</$list>
Not being convinced I have my vars set right, this as an alternative:
*<$vars theCount={{{ [all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]
+[count[]] }}} >*
On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 2:25:02 PM UTC-3 0 0 wrote:
> <$list filter="[has[frequency]]"> I have 10 recurring tasks
> <$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]"> 7 tasks
> haven't been completed in {{!!frequency}} days. last-contact contains the
> timestamp of latest completion.
> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
> </$list>
> </$list>
>
> As expected the output is 7 tiddler titles:
> Task1
> Task2
> Task4
> Task5
> Task8
> Task9
> Task10
>
> After this list I want:
> You have *[7]* tasks.
> ___________________
> <$vars theCount={{{ [all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}count[]]
> }}} > does not seem to work.
> "[all[current]..." contains only one title at a time which then either
> passes the !days filter or not. Thus after count[], <<theCount>> variable
> will contain a 1 or a 0.
>
> I'm afraid there is no solution at my level of competence :/
>
> maanantai 13. syyskuuta 2021 klo 18.36.56 UTC+3 [email protected]
> kirjoitti:
>
>> This may seem silly, but a mock-up screenshot of expected output would be
>> pretty awesome. Information with labels of what the information means.
>>
>> My last sample I posted should have had the question "something like
>> this?", because it definitely wasn't any kind of "this is the answer you're
>> looking for.'
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:20:15 PM UTC-3 Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>
>>> Well, in the middle of doing something else, so not quite sure if I have
>>> the right count in the highlighted filter.
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:18:45 PM UTC-3 Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>>
>>>> <$list filter="[has[frequency]]">
>>>> *<$vars theCount={{{
>>>> [all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}count[]] }}} >*
>>>>
>>>> <$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
>>>> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
>>>> </$list>
>>>> *</$vars>*
>>>> </$list>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:12:45 PM UTC-3 0 0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your answer, I appreciate your help.
>>>>> However, your suggestion does not seem to affect the underlying
>>>>> problem: I'm unable to get the number of tiddlers that pass the filter of
>>>>> second list.
>>>>> I'll try to elaborate what I meant in my original post.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example let's say the outer list alone would output 100 tiddlers.
>>>>> If I added count[] to this filter to get the number of tiddlers this
>>>>> outer
>>>>> list outputs I will see the number 100 instead of 100 individual titles.
>>>>> Then the inner list filters out 30 tiddlers that do not satisfy the
>>>>> additional condition. I see 70 tiddler titles that pass the outer AND
>>>>> inner
>>>>> filter, but I'm unable to count them (except by hand).
>>>>> Adding count[] to the inner list would just yield a mix of 30 zeroes
>>>>> (0 0 0 0...for each time the currently evaluated tiddler does not pass
>>>>> the
>>>>> inner filter) and 70 ones (1 1 1 1...whenever it does).
>>>>>
>>>>> Now either I'd need some way to have a variable that would increase
>>>>> each time a tiddler passes the inner filter, or I'd need to have it all
>>>>> in
>>>>> a single-level list (which with current setup doesn't work exactly for
>>>>> the
>>>>> reason Eric describes). Or there could be a completely different approach
>>>>> that I'm unable to see.
>>>>>
>>>>> 0
>>>>> maanantai 13. syyskuuta 2021 klo 18.02.58 UTC+3 Eric Shulman kirjoitti:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 6:51:14 AM UTC-7 [email protected]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aside: we could merge the two <$list> filters together
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That wouldn't work in this case, as the inner filter uses
>>>>>> `{!!frequency}`, which depends upon the outer filter to set the
>>>>>> `currentTiddler` value to each tiddler that `has[frequency]`
>>>>>> If the two filters were merged, then `{!!frequency}` would refer to
>>>>>> the tiddler that contains the `$list` widget, rather than each tiddler
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> `has[frequency]`
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -e
>>>>>>
>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/29dced74-6f11-4bb5-938a-48adc89865b5n%40googlegroups.com.
