This may seem silly, but a mock-up screenshot of expected output would be
pretty awesome. Information with labels of what the information means.
My last sample I posted should have had the question "something like
this?", because it definitely wasn't any kind of "this is the answer you're
looking for.'
On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:20:15 PM UTC-3 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> Well, in the middle of doing something else, so not quite sure if I have
> the right count in the highlighted filter.
>
> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:18:45 PM UTC-3 Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> <$list filter="[has[frequency]]">
>> *<$vars theCount={{{ [all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}count[]]
>> }}} >*
>>
>> <$list filter="[all[current]!days:last-contact{!!frequency}]">
>> <$link><$view field="title"/></$link>
>> </$list>
>> *</$vars>*
>> </$list>
>>
>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 12:12:45 PM UTC-3 0 0 wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for your answer, I appreciate your help.
>>> However, your suggestion does not seem to affect the underlying problem:
>>> I'm unable to get the number of tiddlers that pass the filter of second
>>> list.
>>> I'll try to elaborate what I meant in my original post.
>>>
>>> For example let's say the outer list alone would output 100 tiddlers. If
>>> I added count[] to this filter to get the number of tiddlers this outer
>>> list outputs I will see the number 100 instead of 100 individual titles.
>>> Then the inner list filters out 30 tiddlers that do not satisfy the
>>> additional condition. I see 70 tiddler titles that pass the outer AND inner
>>> filter, but I'm unable to count them (except by hand).
>>> Adding count[] to the inner list would just yield a mix of 30 zeroes (0
>>> 0 0 0...for each time the currently evaluated tiddler does not pass the
>>> inner filter) and 70 ones (1 1 1 1...whenever it does).
>>>
>>> Now either I'd need some way to have a variable that would increase each
>>> time a tiddler passes the inner filter, or I'd need to have it all in a
>>> single-level list (which with current setup doesn't work exactly for the
>>> reason Eric describes). Or there could be a completely different approach
>>> that I'm unable to see.
>>>
>>> 0
>>> maanantai 13. syyskuuta 2021 klo 18.02.58 UTC+3 Eric Shulman kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 6:51:14 AM UTC-7 [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aside: we could merge the two <$list> filters together
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That wouldn't work in this case, as the inner filter uses
>>>> `{!!frequency}`, which depends upon the outer filter to set the
>>>> `currentTiddler` value to each tiddler that `has[frequency]`
>>>> If the two filters were merged, then `{!!frequency}` would refer to the
>>>> tiddler that contains the `$list` widget, rather than each tiddler that
>>>> `has[frequency]`
>>>>
>>>> -e
>>>>
>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/97d82f57-4bbd-4b7f-9e04-c291ab624c16n%40googlegroups.com.
