I just tested this on both 5.1.23 and 5.2.0pre. I created one tiddler
containing
```
{{{ [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
:filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
```
and another tiddler with the four tags (note capitalization and spaces in
the tag values).
It *does* seem to work on both versions of TW
-e
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 7:02:19 AM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote:
> Alvaro;
>
> You suggested something like this
> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]**,**[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>
> As far as I can see this does not work on the pre-release and the t6ag
> format [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]] (simplified) is not documented
>
> Does not work. So I asked if you tested this?
>
>
> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 22:11:48 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>
>> I don't know if I understand you.
>>
>>
>> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 5:31:18 UTC+2, TW Tones
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Alvaro;
>>>
>>> Have you tested this?
>>>
>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>
>>> I cant see it working. Here <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Parameter>
>>> is says
>>>
>>> * NEW IN: 5.1.23 Filter operators support multiple parameters which are
>>> separated by a , character.*
>>>
>>> *For example: [param1],[param2] or <param1>,{param2}*
>>> However as far as I can see only if such multiple parameters are
>>> documented in the operator in question.
>>>
>>> Tones
>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 01:39:53 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>>
>>>> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>>>>
>>>> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple parameters in
>>>> filter operator with commas (from last version, 5.1.23). And we can add a
>>>> second filter run that it applies your filter to result of first run. Then
>>>> you can rewrite your filter something like this (in filtering transclusion)
>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>
>>>> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
>>>> [email protected] escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> That's fine by me.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>>>>
>>>>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input
>>>>> would be the 4 tags you want.
>>>>>
>>>>> something like that:
>>>>>
>>>>> \define fun(tags)
>>>>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>>>>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>>>>> \end
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would
>>>>> this be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, [email protected] a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play
>>>>>> around with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified
>>>>>> tags, but only those four tags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file,
>>>>>> and drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a
>>>>>> gander.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing,
>>>>>> with some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a
>>>>>> bit
>>>>>> easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more
>>>>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe
>>>>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b5e785e5-7b0a-427d-9d29-46d3185e7aa6n%40googlegroups.com.
