Alvaro;
Have you tested this?
{{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
:filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
I cant see it working. Here <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Parameter> is
says
* NEW IN: 5.1.23 Filter operators support multiple parameters which are
separated by a , character.*
*For example: [param1],[param2] or <param1>,{param2}*
However as far as I can see only if such multiple parameters are documented
in the operator in question.
Tones
On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 01:39:53 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>
> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple parameters in
> filter operator with commas (from last version, 5.1.23). And we can add a
> second filter run that it applies your filter to result of first run. Then
> you can rewrite your filter something like this (in filtering transclusion)
> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>
> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>
>
> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
> jn.pierr...@gmail.com escribió:
>
>> That's fine by me.
>>
>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>
>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input
>> would be the 4 tags you want.
>>
>> something like that:
>>
>> \define fun(tags)
>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>> \end
>>
>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would this
>> be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, cj.v...@gmail.com a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play around
>>> with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified tags, but
>>> only those four tags.
>>>
>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file, and
>>> drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a gander.
>>>
>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing, with
>>> some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a bit
>>> easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more
>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe
>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something ...
>>>
>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8b51d326-471c-4869-bdf9-6c5680937652n%40googlegroups.com.
