Alvaro;
You suggested something like this
{{{ [tag[Tag 1]**,**[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
:filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
As far as I can see this does not work on the pre-release and the t6ag
format [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]] (simplified) is not documented
Does not work. So I asked if you tested this?
On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 22:11:48 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
> I don't know if I understand you.
>
>
> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 5:31:18 UTC+2, TW Tones escribió:
>
>> Alvaro;
>>
>> Have you tested this?
>>
>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>
>> I cant see it working. Here <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Parameter>
>> is says
>>
>> * NEW IN: 5.1.23 Filter operators support multiple parameters which are
>> separated by a , character.*
>>
>> *For example: [param1],[param2] or <param1>,{param2}*
>> However as far as I can see only if such multiple parameters are
>> documented in the operator in question.
>>
>> Tones
>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 01:39:53 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>
>>> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>>>
>>> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple parameters in
>>> filter operator with commas (from last version, 5.1.23). And we can add a
>>> second filter run that it applies your filter to result of first run. Then
>>> you can rewrite your filter something like this (in filtering transclusion)
>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>
>>> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>>>
>>>
>>> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
>>> jn.pierr...@gmail.com escribió:
>>>
>>>> That's fine by me.
>>>>
>>>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>>>
>>>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the input
>>>> would be the 4 tags you want.
>>>>
>>>> something like that:
>>>>
>>>> \define fun(tags)
>>>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>>>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>>>> \end
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator. Would
>>>> this be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, cj.v...@gmail.com a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play around
>>>>> with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four specified tags, but
>>>>> only those four tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the file,
>>>>> and drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to take a
>>>>> gander.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of thing, with
>>>>> some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find the result a bit
>>>>> easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or maybe more
>>>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.) Maybe
>>>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or something ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d59ad16a-d51c-4d14-be24-0394ef067cd1n%40googlegroups.com.
