Hi Tobias, > I don't see a reason for transcluding the overview into your 'tiddler > body' nor does it make any sense to me to automatically have a section > in a tiddler that is to be called like the tiddler.
I agree with you. But the only reason is historical - this TW is a glossary system (~2000 items) and a lot of tiddlers were structured in the past with a section named equal to tiddler name. Having a !Content section in parallel makes tiddler embedding much more complicated - no one knows is the referenced tiddler old structured or new. Michael Tobias Beer schrieb: > I don't see a reason for transcluding the overview into your 'tiddler > body' nor does it make any sense to me to automatically have a section > in a tiddler that is to be called like the tiddler. > > Why not have a structure like this and leave out all the redundant > transclusions... > > !Overview > ... > !Contents > ... > !Weblinks > ... > ? > > Sorry if that might not be helpful, but it really looks like your > unnessessarily complicating stuff. Keep it simple. > > Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
