> I agree with you. But the only reason is historical - this TW is a > glossary system (~2000 items) and a lot of tiddlers were structured in > the past with a section named equal to tiddler name. Having a !Content > section in parallel makes tiddler embedding much more complicated - no > one knows is the referenced tiddler old structured or new. > > Michael
Mhhh, I would not recommend putting a 'content' section in parallel, but rather as a replacement. So wouldn't something like that be an actual reason to restructure? Or do you have so much code depending on that old structure that you just can't let go of it? It does not seem very difficult to make a script that checks all tiddlers as to whether or not there is a heading that goes by the name of the tiddler and to replace it with a heading callled "!Content"... be that 2000 or 20 tiddlers. On the other hand... how do those 2000 "items" relate to your 800 tiddlers? Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
