I can't really say I'm sold on the idea of just adding TW5 or TWC/2 to the topic name as it feels like we are only treating one aspect of a much larger issue. Just a single example is as the group grows even if you have the prefixes for TW5 for people searching for TWC/2 info they will evidently be searching and having to scroll though who knows how many dozens of pages of TW5 entries to find what they are looking for, and new users starting on TW5 will have issues when they hit the thousands of search results with no prefixes at all, to say nothing about the confusion that could happen for anyone coming from a Google/Bing/web search who has never set foot on the front page of the group before.
It would be nice if Google groups worked more like a normal BBS and we could just have sections for each but in reality a Google group is like a section in a big BBS and so it seems like we are just heading to a bad place keeping them combined given how different they are. +0.5 to the name argument though, well I would agree that really the current TW2/Classic & TW5 names seem rather miss-leading, at the same point developers have the right to name their creations any things they want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
