I am going to step into this one with my two cents worth:

There seems to be a lot of confusion on the part of some that feel TW5 is 
only good for node.js. That is simply not true.

I am a non/developer who does not use node.js or work with online TWs. I 
use standalone TWs offline and upload them to my website with FileZilla. 
Yet even I have gotten to the point of using TW5 as my to do list - a major 
improvement to my TW classic to do list, I should say, and as my 
note-taking tool (see here http://giffmex.org/5notes.htm for the last 
version I bothered to upload), and now to publish my Spanish web materials 
(http://www.giffmex.org/recursosgiffmex.htm). 

The only feature I am really eager for is the ability to get URLS from 
tiddlers, to promote my Spanish materials. Everything else is pretty much 
the way I want it. Yes, it will be a while to get plugins and bells and 
whistles that would be cool to have. But it is amazing what is already 
available, especially just in the last 2 or 3 months. Even in terms of 
visual modifications, there is already the stylesheet option and now the 
Theme tweaks tiddler. And I have already seen and used a Topmenu and a 
special viewtemplate. I can tell it's really not far away before TW5 starts 
exploding with plugins and features.

So the complaints don't resonate with me, and made me wince. Can't blame 
Jeremy if he felt like his work is unwanted after a couple of the comments 
here.

I have used several programs that have come out with radically different 
versions and have retained the name of the old version. There are people 
stll using version 2 of Logos software when it is on version 5, and every 
version of Logos was practically a reinvention of the software. TiddlyWiki 
is no different and TW5 has every right to take over the TW name. 

I can sympathize with those who would like to have the long history of 
discussions and threads in the present Google group available to them in a 
classic-related group and not have to wade through TW5 posts. So if there 
is a way to rename the thread TiddlyWiki classic and give the TiddlyWiki 
group name to TW5, I would be in favor of that option. And I think that 
change should come sooner rather than later. And each group should link to 
the other.

But one thing is to ask for changes in the group and another is to complain 
about the uselessness of software you don't even seem to understand.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to