I am following this thread with interest. I am wondering if a set of
tiddlers is exported as JSON, then they can be reformed into tiddlers when
imported into a new wiki -- either in bulk or as needed.

I've really just discovered dictionary and JSON tiddlers, they open up new
possibilities in my mind. Is there a way of "sending" a tiddler into a JSON
tiddler? It seems like a natural step in a refactoring / editing process,
like the tiddler doesn't need to be chanaged anymore, but no need for "$:/"
prefixes. (I find plugin titles very difficult to read when they are
packaged)

Alex



On 14 January 2016 at 13:33, Mat <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Jed - I must say this can become an extremely valuable tool.
>
> Instead of making drawings, I have attempted to modify your creation.
>
> 1) I discovered it is possible to drag'n drop tiddler links into the
> tiddler bundle filter field! I think this is a very nice aspect and feels
> user friendly. I made that field bigger so it also feels more like a drop
> area and also a "box" into which you put your stuff that you're going to
> bundle. The CSS could be improved though.
>
> 2) I didn't like to see a "missing bundle link" before the bundle was
> created. So, I've made it so that it becomes visible only on clicking
> "Create". A tricky part is to get the bundle name editor to show a default
> name (Tiddler Bundle). I set it as a default value and as a placeholder,
> but it is still not 100%.
>
> 3) I added a small garbage can but it is not implemented.
>
>
> 4) I have not really touched the un-bundling part - and one reason is this:
>
> I think it would be much better if the tiddlers were stored in json
> format! Because;
>
>
>    - There is then no need for a separate un-bundler. It works
>    automatically with the import mechanism that everyone is familiar with.
>    Anybody can directly just grab a bundle!
>    - JSON is very much readable.
>    - ...and using JSON it means we don't need to introduce the arbitrary
>    format currently implemented.
>
>
> That first bullet is clearly the biggie and would increase usability
> tremendously - or what do you say?
>
> Again, thank you for an extremely promising creation. I have said of Tinka
> that I consider it one of the most important plugins because it opens up
> for simple end users like myself to make (and share!) other plugins - i.e
> it is a *tool-to-make-tools*. Super important. IMO, the Tiddler Bundler
> is *even a step forward* in that it makes things super transparent!
>
> With some further UI tweaks to both the Tiddler Bundler and Tinka, I think
> they will make perfect complements.
>
> Demo <http://temp-tiddlerbundles.tiddlyspot.com/>
>
> <:-)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/162dce4d-b8f2-4875-8079-fb9de4d57bcc%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/162dce4d-b8f2-4875-8079-fb9de4d57bcc%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CALc1hYfGT3hgKasf7WAE7G7pXm-rqm%2Bf%2BCUMbwRgd%3D_JKs32nQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to