My 2 cents...
Yes to IDs.
No to users creating them. Ever.
They should be GUIDs.
Not concatenated titles+dates or anything related to existing tiddler
data. This will likely fail and scale poorly.
They must be created "behind the scenes", but easily discovered/usable
by experienced users.
Linking should support both titles and GUIDs (either/or)
Contract: GUID links are robust and must therefore work in any environment
Contract: titles are "optimistic" and "best effort, good faith" attempts
at succeeding. In a standalone TW, they'll be as good as they are already.
Eric's "caption" approach is equivalent to my "subtitle" approach. Works
fine for a TW-book edition I'm developing (very slowly, not published yet).
And it works fine in the context ("domain") I'm trying to support (no js
required!). My Chapters and sections have ID-like titles. My subtitles are
stored in a subtitle field.
If you're going to TWederate (publish) a given tiddler, I can imagine a
routine that trawls the text looking for links that do NOT carry a GUID...
and warn against potential breakages before allowing you to proceed <- off
the cuff brainfart ;)
Like I said, my 0.02
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b0d24ed4-fa5a-442f-bc48-e82863c60b7a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
