As far as publicly documented wiki markup systems go TW is not much on the map.
It is NOT in the Babelmark Registry <https://github.com/babelmark/babelmark-registry>. Nobody is bending to create convertors to it. But TW's basic architecture is, in fact, VERY flexible. In truth, its got an AGNOSTIC PARSER SYSTEM that could convert most anything to anything. This is unlike most other wiki systems which are far less modular or flexible. IMO, we are under-selling TiddlyWiki's potential for variant markup. In theory it would be possible to support many more markup systems than it currently does. And without major changes to its architecture. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3caa3673-f496-45ca-80eb-ec3dc6965c14%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
