PMario wrote: ... As you pointed out. TW has the potential, to convert one syntax to an other (with some limitations). ... BUT ... not with the internal AST, that we use at the moment...
Right. AST (the Abstract Syntax Tree <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_syntax_tree>, not the Azienda Siciliana Trasporti <http://www.aziendasicilianatrasporti.it/>). BUT, right now the other routes in TW markup/format options are somewhat mute. Mainly, I think, because the both creating Content Types and the workings of the basic parser are (as far as I can see) not so well documented. At the moment I think its looking harder to than it actually is to achieve variant markup systems because of that. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/964d7a8c-953b-4aea-a1dc-d23497dc6e0e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
