One of the things that interests me a lot that, that the talk raised a bit, and which no one seems to know how to answer is ... :-)
WHAT exactly is an SU (Semantic Unit) in TW writing (or computing writing In General, for that matter)? There is a kind of rule of thumb "its maybe a paragraph"? But, of course that won't quite work for the one-sentence brevity of a Nietzsche. Its obviously highly context dependent. And I doubt much of that context lives on the computer itself. The idea in TW towards writing "the shortest semantic whole possible" (the word "fragment" here that is thrown around has muddied waters; they are not fragments so much as whole-parts-of-wholes) allows for later re-combinations to form more complex semantics. However, I think its bit of an, ultimately, moot and mute point, in the sense that human meaning is often an interaction with technologies of expression themselves (though no where ever fully defined by them). So its an area of intuited understanding, not formal logic? On the other hand, who's offering the horse which water? Josiah On Monday, 10 December 2018 12:49:14 UTC+1, PMario wrote: > > Hi, > > Here's the video: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv1UfLPK7_Q&index=9&list=PLvL2NEhYV4ZtWFBNOrApXaIoCTtj-yk7Y > > have fun! > mario > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/52cc7ffb-d7df-429c-83b8-604e21acb4cd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
