Josiah,

Riffing on from what you said, here is a personal reflection:

A life in IT has taught me many things, once we become more expert at 
something, some of the basics become internalised, they take on an 
intuitive understanding rather than needing the application of intellectual 
rules, ie their cognitive load is reduced.  The use of system 1 not System 
2 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow) one of my 
favourite books this decade.

What I find with TiddlyWiki, it is somewhat unstructured and thus very 
flexible, its features allows one to make a mess as much as it allows one 
to exercise the skills and knowledge one has acquired. I seem to have no 
difficulty naming tiddlers and never seem to have problems renaming them 
because I rarely if ever have any dependencies on tiddler names, or where I 
do there is never a reason to rename them, nor do I seem to have any 
difficulties intuitively knowing exactly when to divide the content in 
anyway, that is, I seem to have no difficulty in understanding a  *SU 
(Semantic Unit) in TW writing (or computing writing In General, for that 
matter)*? The problem is this is already in my system 1 and  am often 
finding myself trying to reverse engineer this knowledge, so I can guide 
others towards using the same methods and rules. Sometimes I want to 
understand what underlies my intuition, to build a conceptual model, and 
sometimes extend its power.

I would speculate however my grasp of Semantic Units is based on the 
lessons of the following disciplines

   - Structured software design and programming
   - Object oriented design
   - Analysis and Synthesis
   - Database design and "normalisation"
   - Alternate database models (Structured, Network, Relational etc...)
   - Modularity and blackbox design principals

TiddlyWiki allows the democratisation of knowledge and application of 
algorithms commonly found in the above. But there are few rules.

I think we may need to obtain or construct a new discipline, that draws on 
the above disciplines (and others) selectively, such that we can pass to 
those seeking to apply knowledge and algorithms on top of our   "non-linear 
personal web notebook" or our "non-linear platform".

My use of TiddlyWiki continues to evolve rapidly, but I believe this is in 
part due to my understanding of the underlying concepts and patterns 
acquired in a life as a Information Technology professional. The question 
is how can we maximise what others, without such experience can do? or the 
exchange of such concepts between those with the expertise to others with 
similar needs.

Regards
Tony



On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 3:43:01 AM UTC+11, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> One of the things that interests me a lot that the talk raised a bit--and 
> which no one seems to know how to answer is ... :-)
>
> - WHAT exactly is an SU (Semantic Unit) in TW writing (or computing 
> writing In General, for that matter)?
>
> There is a kind of rule of thumb "its maybe a paragraph"? But, of course 
> that won't quite work for the one-sentence brevity of a Nietzsche.
>
> Its obviously highly context dependent. And I doubt much of that context 
> lives on the computer itself.
>
> The idea in TW towards writing "the shortest semantic whole possible" (the 
> word "fragment" here that is thrown around has muddied waters; they are not 
> fragments so much as whole-parts-of-wholes) allows for later 
> re-combinations to form more complex semantics. 
>
> However, I think its bit of an, ultimately, moot and mute point, in the 
> sense that human meaning is often an interaction with technologies of 
> expression themselves (though no where ever fully defined by them). So its 
> an area of intuited understanding, not formal logic? On the other hand, 
> who's offering the horse which water?
>
> Josiah
>
> On Monday, 10 December 2018 12:49:14 UTC+1, PMario wrote:
>>
>> Hi, 
>>
>> Here's the video: 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv1UfLPK7_Q&index=9&list=PLvL2NEhYV4ZtWFBNOrApXaIoCTtj-yk7Y
>>
>> have fun!
>> mario
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7ea13ed6-d87b-4068-843d-cd7a024bff2f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to