PMario wrote: > > For me it would be very interesting to have a mechanism, that would > suggest "meaningful tags" by analysing the prose text(s). ... but it needs > to work without a 3rd party server. It should be integrated into TW. ... Is > this possible? >
Great query. Internally would need limiting ... associative broader remit (all homonyms, synonyms etc) library size too vast? Smart text analysis possible (stemming; redundancy reduction) but limited. IMO this could work for "domains of interest". For instance, the obvious examples would be "tags for components of TW" which could be a data tiddler listing commonly used synonyms. Obvious would be stuff like "plugin" v. "plugins" I doubt internal "all and every possible" is possible without external referent input. BUT I doubt its needed to assert a reliable tag. Taggery is in "domains of interest" and that finitude looks good enough? Just thoughts Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/46304181-a66f-4d91-9aae-734084c28bcd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
