Riz I seen and used your CSS morphs of libraries. Very good.
Right now I sense the issue is about getting some base library that can replace Vanilla, look like it, but have the better layout matrices CSS now inhabits? (I often feel like the guy who saw but could not do.) IMO CSS is staring us in the face for getting explicit. But I slightly worry that 5 solutions will be far worse than one. Best wishes Josiah Riz wrote: > > I like the direction of discussion, even if I don't exactly grasp the > advantages of the original post. It is high time to update the default css > of tiddlywiki. I suggest rather than building it from scratch up, base it > upon an existing css framework like skeleton.css(3kb) - which will give > decent typography, convienient grids and responsive layout overall. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f947d410-9ed0-47f6-ba45-de9b59cc0500%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
