>
> Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> ...
>
>> Yuck. One problem is that the average lifetime of things like CSS 
>> frameworks is only 2-5 years, and TW5 has already been around for a lot 
>> longer than that. There’s a danger that anything that we adopt will become 
>> abandoned and unmaintained. That’s part of the motivation for the idea of 
>> translatable CSS classes above.
>>
>
>
 PMario (PM) wrote:
>
> Yes. That's exactly, what I want to point out. ... 
>
> All major browsers adopted the CSS grid <https://caniuse.com/#search=grid> 
> now. So we should think about the possibilities we have here. 
>
 
I'm no CSS expert. But I'd like to comment that CSS3, on introduction, was 
a defining moment. 

Future CSS will likely modularise. CSS4 likely won't be one thing--rather 
its likely to scale off 3 in several directions. 

Aligning with the full remit of CSS3 would ensure longevity. I'm not sure 
even popular frameworks fully use it yet?

I agree with PM in concern that some approaches are better than others for 
TW. That some libraries may not be ideal. 

I'd say there are TWO issues ...

  1 -- what is a library approach that stays open enough?

  2 -- the importance of making the existing CSS easier to understand. (I 
sort of suspect if we had easier insight into our own CSS a swathe of 
obstacles would disappear).
        I mean there is NO list of classes in a form a designer can use yet?

AND I want to comment ...

  3 - we DO have CSS skilled people ... like Riz, Telmiger, J.D., BTC and 
others who may have thoughts worth hearing.

Best wishes
Josiah

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e70ec0d6-9cbc-4674-b72d-37f40087b786%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to