Josiah, You say *without conversion to TW classes. * Is this because you want to change fundamentally the way tiddlyWiki works?.
I use the css in these frameworks to craft content within my tiddlers typically using html with wikitext embeded to generate lists and columns or display a value. On a current project I am building html templates for the display of content in a given tiddler. For example I have a tiddler type of Office, with a couple of dozen fields, and I use vanilla html/css to structure the way the tiddler content is displayed through a template. It appears such html and css rich templates embeded with wikitext can be considered equivalent to HTML pages, such pages can be designed with elements from any css platform with few limits that wikitext can usually overcome. HTML Layouts can be found all over the net that can get such a page started. I would like to know what you are doing that you want to convert to tw classes? Regards Tony On Saturday, May 18, 2019 at 3:46:45 AM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao TonyM > > TonyM wrote: >> >> My 2 cents. The addition of w3cc, bootstrap etc... is trivial, just >> obtain the desired css file install and tag as a stylesheet. >> > > IMO its not trivial. Its not useful to install css libraries without > conversion to TW classes. And that is slog. It is serious work, I think. > > I think there is an issue about libraries. Meaning--is one or another a > better fit with TW? Better to go with one that is a good fit? > > Side thoughts > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8c74e6a1-4906-471e-a19f-c497b27a4806%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
