I used OneNote a while. It looks nice. Part of the issues with it I think is that "interface takes over". The neat look trumps the utility for purpose.
I have a long of history with "free form databases" -- as they used to be called. I was, and am, always interested in *emergent* pattern rather than software with power but a visual structure that is ultimately restrictive. I used "InfoSelect" extensively, especially in its DOS days, because it was, then, a neat commercial realisation of free-form. I'd love do a TW replication of InfoSelect in TW. Some of the DOS-days thinking was astute. Things like Lotus Notes, rarely mentioned now, were excellent too. Side-notes Josiah On Monday, 22 July 2019 04:57:41 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > I came across this accidentally. Maybe everyone else is familiar with it? > > > https://www.slant.co/versus/2130/5116/~microsoft-onenote_vs_tiddlywik > > I found the "con" that said "Without JavaScript nothing is visible" to be > incredibly silly. Like "without electricity light bulbs are useless." > > On the other hand, ON had a much longer list of cons. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e91825a0-5bff-4514-ad5e-26034d8f3bb3%40googlegroups.com.
