Mat & @Reaktorblue Mat wrote: > > @Reaktorblue > > I think it is very valuable for the TW project with input like what you > just wrote... >
I agree. So, the following may seem like I'm defending TW but I'm not... > >> R: [...] every time I want to use TiddlyWiki, I have to take a lot of >> time to configure it the way I want it. >> > > From what I understand, people only have *one* instance of OneNote... So > a fair comparison would be to compar it to *one* instance of a TW. While > this might have to be configured, this a one time thing (if you configure > it "enough"). > Mat. I think a factor here is *to what extent a user can get an "off-the-shelf" TW, already tweaked *to be specific enough for OneNote like enough behaviour? We *don't* normally present "packaged" end-user software. Rahter, we offer huge diversiting of plugins and tweaks. But rarely present rounded products *ready-honed for purpose*. The norm IS you have to be *into* tweaking to get the best from TW. I think that is just a fact. One that could be changed for the better. Thoughts TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9401b8df-e799-4034-afad-37273f488b13%40googlegroups.com.
