Folks, For those of you will the decade or so long experience with tiddlywiki you may recall that the google forums are one of tiddlywikis strengths because the policy has being ask and we will help. It does not demand you to search for your answer. I believe this approach should remain, but yes more self serve should be available. TWC used to have a tiddlywiki.org wikimedia if I remember correctly, but we have being naturally reluctant to introduce another wiki to document our wiki.
I have every intention of *constantly document[ing] usage*. and at least do so in my own notes. However I have "a life" that limits how much I can commit to Tiddlywiki (to be honest already too much, its an obsession) As my expertise increases the more confident I can see both the questions and the answers, and thus contribute to the documentation. But it also drives me to participate in issues, changes and discussions for the development of tiddlywiki. A lot of us are contributing to the future of tiddlywiki rather than the present moment documentation of tiddlywiki. As I said I and many others have considerable resources and documentation that is not necessarily polished sitting offline. Mohamad of late and others "in history" have built fantastic resources and people should be encouraged to leave the forum and search on the open internet for "anything tiddlywiki". The truth is information ages so unless it is collected into a single repository that is maintained it ages and looses its accuracy. Some regular posts to the forum on how to contribute to the documentation and core would help promote participation. Regards Tony On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 10:49:21 PM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > TonyM > > We are not in argument, really. > > It is more that PEOPLE LIKE YOU *constantly document usage*. Well. > > But your efforts GO DOWN THE TOILET. Because a few days later how do we > find them? > > That, I think is the central issue. > > That we are mad to believe that new users can grapple with this Google > Group, > even though, somewhere in it, lays an answer. > > Just MO. > > TT > > On Monday, 16 September 2019 14:32:10 UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >> >> Tt? >> >> I don't think anyone should need to be a detective but its important to >> recognise the source of such material is community contributions. >> >> Otherwise we are in furious agreement. >> >> Tony >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/238cef0e-a731-4b1a-b8ba-10dd3b164ea0%40googlegroups.com.
