On Apr 29, 12:11 pm, Martin Budden <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I understand this. What's your view when 2.5.1 becomes available - > this does have added value (bug fixes etc). Should 2.5.1 then become > the default upgrade? If not, what would be the criteria for changing > the default upgrade from 2.4.3 to 2.5.1?
Just for the sake of discussion/argument, in my perfect universe, but fixes would happen concurrent on trees 2.4.x and 2.5.x. The default upgrade would increase in the 2.4 series until 2.5.x was ready to be 2.6. Even stable, odd development, like the Linux kernel uses (used?). If we accept Eric's argument that TiddlyWiki is mature in some form, this seems like a reasonable way to be cautious and adventurous at the same time. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
