These are good questions, Morris. However, they're very jQuery-centric. I was thinking of a (still somewhat vague) bigger picture - so in that context, jQuery might be considered an implementation detail. (Nevertheless, the jQuery integration was a catalyst for reviving this longstanding issue.)
> what is the difference between having jQuery in the TiddlyWiki > core than having it in the PreHead as an external file? In terms of simply making jQuery functionality available (e.g. for plugins to use), there's not much of a difference. However, there are quite a few areas in the TiddlyWiki core which could be refactored to make use of jQuery, at which point integration is of course vital. > I understand that one of jQuery's attributes is the large number of > plugins developed for it. This is also one of TiddlyWiki's great > strengths. It seems to me that this is a built-in conflict There's a significant difference; TiddlyWiki plugins are for end-users, while jQuery plugins provide developers with functionality (code) they can use when building applications (such as creating a TiddlyWiki plugin). So I don't see any such conflict here. (Also see the earlier discussions and announcements on jQuery integration.) -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
