Martin,
In my opinion we would have, in SVN terms, a temporary period of 2
branches of TW.
The first branch, let's call it "Stable TW", starts off from 2.4.3 and
is only updated in case of serious bugs. No new functionality
whatsoever. So over time there will be a new "Stable TW" called 2.4.4
and so on, but only to fix bugs.
The other branch, let's call it "jQuery TW", starts off from 2.5.0.
Yes, the bugfixes applied to "Stable TW" should be applied to this
branch too. But furthermore this branch will be changed by adding new
functionality based on the new possibilities of jQuery. Presumably
also existing core-functions will gradually be replaced by jQuery
implementations, because of greater flexibility or better performance
or other reasons.
Eventually there will be a "jQuery TW", 2.5.n or even better 3.0.n in
which jQuery really has become into play by new added value to the TW.
And, as said, this version of course also have all bugfixes in it. Now
it's the right time, after carefull testing on backward compatibilty,
to declare "jQuery TW" to become the new "Stable TW", and get rid of
the 2.4.n-branch.
Actually it would be best to manage it like a project: define the
goals (functionality) to be reached in advance. Then start
implementing those with jQuery, and once the new set of functionality
is ready and tested, it's at the same time the end of the 2.4.n-series
and "jQuery TW" becomes "Stable TW".
Does this answer your question? And remember, this is only my humble
personal opinion.
Best regards / Ton.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
