Running two branches makes sense if we plan to do potentially
disruptive changes on one of the branches. I read into your posting an
assumption that using jQuery will, at least for a while, make TW less
stable. jQuery makes TW bigger, but as long as we are careful, it
should not introduce any extra instabilities.

I say this because I am reluctant to run two branches - doing so is a
significant amount of extra work and I'm not convinced that the
benefits it brings are worth it.

Martin

2009/4/29 Ton van Rooijen <[email protected]>:
>
> Martin,
> In my opinion we would have, in SVN terms, a temporary period of 2
> branches of TW.
> The first branch, let's call it "Stable TW", starts off from 2.4.3 and
> is only updated in case of serious bugs. No new functionality
> whatsoever. So over time there will be a new "Stable TW" called 2.4.4
> and so on, but only to fix bugs.
> The other branch, let's call it "jQuery TW", starts off from 2.5.0.
> Yes, the bugfixes applied to "Stable TW" should be applied to this
> branch too. But furthermore this branch will be changed by adding new
> functionality based on the new possibilities of jQuery. Presumably
> also existing core-functions will gradually be replaced by jQuery
> implementations, because of greater flexibility or better performance
> or other reasons.
> Eventually there will be a "jQuery TW", 2.5.n or even better 3.0.n in
> which jQuery really has become into play by new added value to the TW.
> And, as said, this version of course also have all bugfixes in it. Now
> it's the right time, after carefull testing on backward compatibilty,
> to declare "jQuery TW" to become the new "Stable TW", and get rid of
> the 2.4.n-branch.
> Actually it would be best to manage it like a project: define the
> goals (functionality) to be reached in advance. Then start
> implementing those with jQuery, and once the new set of functionality
> is ready and tested, it's at the same time the end of the 2.4.n-series
> and "jQuery TW" becomes "Stable TW".
> Does this answer your question? And remember, this is only my humble
> personal opinion.
> Best regards / Ton.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to