The TOOLTIP and LINK macros sound good, but those would work equally well for images rendering the IMG macro as currently scoped redundant. Surely it would be more flexible, consistent and minimalist to deprecate the IMG macro in favour of adding any further new features to the transclusion syntax?
For example, a template syntax for sizing images: ((Motovun Jack.jpg) <<image 120x60>>) The big gain here would be the ability to use the full power of filters, so for a thumbnail gallery: ((([tag[pictures]])) <<image 60x60>>) Yes, thats the idea. All we need to do this is a way for the image macro to reference the current context tiddler, just as the view macro does at present. So, your example might come out as: ((([tag[pictures]])) <<link>< <<image width:60 height:60>> >) Here the idea is that omitting the target for the link and the image would reference the current context tiddler. Best wishes Jeremy Best regards John. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/-/aCnvkv978Y8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
