I see, yes that is good. However there is now way to much redundancy for my taste. All the following seem to be equivalent:
1. ((Motovun Jack.jpg)) 2. ((Motovun Jack.jpg) <<image>>) 3. [img[Motovun Jack.jpg]] 4. <<image [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> 5. <<tiddler [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> And there are two different syntaxes for attaching links and tooltips to images, with confusingly different scoping models. I would advocate removing syntax 3 altogether, removing the ability to specify the tiddler directly in 4 and 5 relying on transclusion context, remove the ability to specify the link and the tooltip from the image macro. For 2.x compatibility, there can be an optional package using the extensibility features to add some of these deprecated features back in again. This way, 5.0 can be clean and efficient for new users and people willing to migrate. John. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/-/u_kU5I8UhyUJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
