> > It seems that it;s still not possible to display images from an > http://reference as it was in the previous TiddlyWIKI. >
That is correct - as things stand, it is only possible to display external images via an inline <img src="blah"> tag. I have thought that the old [img[URL]] syntax could be re-introduced as a shortcut for the <img> tag. > I have been rolling out a solution based on use of "img" links and was > hoping to how how much nicer TiddyWIKI5 is to look at. We keep a load of > screenshots as files on a external system - without these links working my > solution does not either. > You can use image links in TW5 like this: <$link to="TiddlerTitle"><img src="myimage.jpeg></$link> It can be simplified by using a macro definition at the top of a tiddler. For example: \define linkimage(title,url) <$link to="$title$"><img src="$url$"></$link> \end Here is an image: <<linkimage MyTiddler myimage.jpeg>> > > Any chance that you're secretly holding back this feature? > Ha! I'm just a poor documentarian. Best wishes Jeremy > > Thanks. > > kjc > > > On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:34:17 PM UTC-4, PMario wrote: >> >> On Jul 30, 11:33 pm, John Hind <[email protected]> wrote: >> > However there is now way to much redundancy for my taste. All the >> following >> > seem to be equivalent: >> > >> > 1. ((Motovun Jack.jpg)) >> @jeremy >> I'm not 100% sure, but I think, the ((...)) starts it's live as a >> replacement for the <<inclusion ...>> macro, that was used inside >> template tiddlers. It just did include text from a tiddler, without >> any <div> or <span> wrapper into the template. right? >> So the usecase is totally different to a <<tiddler>> transclusion. >> >> > 4. <<image [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> >> > 5. <<tiddler [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> >> For me this are 2 totally different macros. That both of them display >> the x.jpg tiddler as a picture is a coincidence. If I change the >> "type" field of x.jpg to "text/plain" I want <<tiddler [[Motovun >> Jack.jpg]] "className">> to display the tiddler content as text. With >> jpg, it would only make sense for debugging but anyway. With svg it >> makes sense ..... >> >> <<image [[anypic]] width:111 height:111 other image specific params to >> come >> ... should display a tiddlers content as a picture, no matter >> what type the tiddler is. >> >> -m >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
