Here's what I tried, using your example \define linkimage(title,url) <$link to="$title$"><img src="$http:\\orbit/livelink/llisapi.dll/open/5270759$"></$link> \end
Here is an image: <<linkimage MyTiddler myimage.jpeg>> Nothing displayed - I should have seen the JPG image which the URL referenced. Am I missing something obvious? *kjc* On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 7:38:36 AM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > It seems that it;s still not possible to display images from an http:// >> reference as it was in the previous TiddlyWIKI. >> > > That is correct - as things stand, it is only possible to display external > images via an inline <img src="blah"> tag. I have thought that the old > [img[URL]] syntax could be re-introduced as a shortcut for the <img> tag. > > >> I have been rolling out a solution based on use of "img" links and was >> hoping to how how much nicer TiddyWIKI5 is to look at. We keep a load of >> screenshots as files on a external system - without these links working my >> solution does not either. >> > > You can use image links in TW5 like this: > > <$link to="TiddlerTitle"><img src="myimage.jpeg></$link> > > It can be simplified by using a macro definition at the top of a tiddler. > For example: > > \define linkimage(title,url) > <$link to="$title$"><img src="$url$"></$link> > \end > > Here is an image: <<linkimage MyTiddler myimage.jpeg>> > > >> >> Any chance that you're secretly holding back this feature? >> > > Ha! I'm just a poor documentarian. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > >> >> Thanks. >> >> kjc >> >> >> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:34:17 PM UTC-4, PMario wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 30, 11:33 pm, John Hind <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > However there is now way to much redundancy for my taste. All the >>> following >>> > seem to be equivalent: >>> > >>> > 1. ((Motovun Jack.jpg)) >>> @jeremy >>> I'm not 100% sure, but I think, the ((...)) starts it's live as a >>> replacement for the <<inclusion ...>> macro, that was used inside >>> template tiddlers. It just did include text from a tiddler, without >>> any <div> or <span> wrapper into the template. right? >>> So the usecase is totally different to a <<tiddler>> transclusion. >>> >>> > 4. <<image [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> >>> > 5. <<tiddler [[Motovun Jack.jpg]]>> >>> For me this are 2 totally different macros. That both of them display >>> the x.jpg tiddler as a picture is a coincidence. If I change the >>> "type" field of x.jpg to "text/plain" I want <<tiddler [[Motovun >>> Jack.jpg]] "className">> to display the tiddler content as text. With >>> jpg, it would only make sense for debugging but anyway. With svg it >>> makes sense ..... >>> >>> <<image [[anypic]] width:111 height:111 other image specific params to >>> come >> ... should display a tiddlers content as a picture, no matter >>> what type the tiddler is. >>> >>> -m >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TiddlyWikiDev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > mailto:[email protected] <javascript:> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
