> > IMO get in list filter is confusing because for me it means "has". > > <<list filter '[tag[Foo AND Bar]][get[##Introduction]]'>> > > > <<get ##Section>> ... returns the _content_ of the section > > [get[ ##Section]] ... returns a tiddler.title, from a tiddler that contains a > section named "Section" > > ... it has the same name, but does something completely different. -> > confusing. > > > i think it should be... > > > [tag[ foo]] ... returns a tiddler, that is tagged foo > [has[ ##Section]] .. returns a tiddler, that contains the named "Section" > > I agree. Assuming that there might just be noone using this at the moment other than myself I am inclined to just rename the filter to [has[foo]].
Since "has" is more generic imo it would need > - fieldname > - ##section > - ::slice > - notags > - ..?? > > All of this sounds sensible and also feels more consistent with the TW5 filter syntax, which I think is a good thing. As for things like notags I think I prefer a prefix that indicates that this is a special-function-type-of-keyword, e.g. $notags. But then, perhaps $notags could also be [tag[]]. I am inclined to reimplement the filter as you suggested. Any objections or further amendments? Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
