Hi Tobias,

regarding AND/NOT options -- have you seen these filters [1]? For simple 
expressions they work nicely, but for complicated ones from filter [2] is 
also needed.

Best regards,
Yakov.

[1] 
http://yakovl.bplaced.net/TW/ExtraFilters.html#NotFilterPlugin%20AndFilterPlugin
[2] http://yakovl.bplaced.net/TW/ExtraFilters.html#FromFilterPlugin

воскресенье, 10 ноября 2013 г., 22:56:04 UTC+4 пользователь Tobias Beer 
написал:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Boolean handling provided by MatchTagsPlugin only applies *within* a 
>> [tag[...]] filter.  What Tobias is discussing is syntax in between filter 
>> terms (which can be any kind of filter, not just [tag[...]]).  Technically 
>> speaking, there wouldn't be any ambiguity if similar syntax were used 
>> there.  Even so, I'm not sure what the right symbol(s) should be.
>>
>
> Also not sure about the right syntax, but I guess a simple formula type 
> syntax as you already implemented within the [tag[]] filter seems the most 
> senstible approach.
>
> While this would surely add to the complexity to the filter andling, I 
> think this provides a powerful framework for introducing more complex 
> filters such as those of TW5 in TW2+... providing better core support what 
> is now achieved using fET or, well, GetPlugin or the good old 
> TiddlerListMacro, if not custom code in inline scripts or transclusions.
>
> Tobias.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to