On Sunday, November 10, 2013 7:51:09 PM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Since "has" is more generic imo it would need > >> - fieldname >> - ##section >> - ::slice >> - notags >> - ..?? >> >> > All of this sounds sensible and also feels more consistent with the TW5 > filter syntax, which I think is a good thing. > > As for things like notags I think I prefer a prefix that indicates that > this is a special-function-type-of-keyword, e.g. $notags. But then, > perhaps $notags could also be [tag[]]. >
After I pressed the "post" button, I realized, that notags actually isn't a good idea :) +1 for [tag[]] > > I am inclined to reimplement the filter as you suggested. Any objections > or further amendments? > I think this would be a cool additional feature for the <<list>> macro. What ever you use for the AND, OR syntax. Make sure it is consistent :) -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
