Hi Yakov, I can only build an empty html TWc with a node script that retrieves the files, concate them and replaces the place holders in the template, no testing is done other than loading the TWc in a browser. I am going to clean up the code a litle and will pass it on.
Have a nice day, Okido Op woensdag 21 maart 2018 11:17:56 UTC+1 schreef Yakov: > > Hi okido, > > do you mean you use some custom script for building TW? Can you share it? > > Actually, now the building process using TW5 works well for me, although > the > > BUILD: creating EMPTY.HTML and INDEX.XML from INDEX.HTML > > stage works slower than I'd like it to. > > Do you have any problems with the current description > <https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki.com/> of the building process? > I've updated it considerably although that was mostly about the structure > of the docs and I'm planning to update building details as well at some > point. Any feedback here is appreciated. > > Best regards, > Yakov. > > четверг, 1 марта 2018 г., 16:01:34 UTC+3 пользователь okido написал: >> >> Hi Yakov, >> >> I used the github repo to build a fresh TWc, I just glued all files >> together with some node scripts. >> The final TWc fails at one point, in Saving.js at line 126 there is a >> lost </script> tag that crashes the TWc when loaded. >> >> 125 content=content.replace(/<div id="saveTest">savetest<\/div>/,'<div >> id="saveTest"></div>'); >> 126 //# clear <applet> following </script>, please use < / script > >> 127 content=content.replace(/script><applet [^\>]*><\/applet>/g,'script>' >> ); >> >> Have a nice day, Okido >> >> Op zondag 28 januari 2018 21:15:50 UTC+1 schreef Yakov: >>> >>> Hi Jeremy, >>> >>> Terrific progress, well done! >>>> >>>> :D thanks for words of encouragement! I myself understand that for >>> end-users there's no progress at all for now, but these steps are necessary >>> and, in a way, are valuable experience. >>> >>> The tiddlywiki.github.com repo is for storing the output of the build >>>> process; the files within it are exposed to the web as >>>> https://classic.tiddlywiki.com. There shouldn't be anything in that >>>> repo that was not generated by the build process. >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Those .tid files were obtained from a backup of >>>> tiddlywiki.tiddlyspace.com that I took before it shut down. >>>> >>>> To make further content changes you'd manually edit those .tid files, >>>> recommit them to the TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki repo, and then re-run the build >>>> process to regenerate tiddlywiki.github.com. >>>> >>>> Right, I see. Yet, I wonder if TW5 is also capable of "exploding" a TWc >>> into those .tid files: it would be a nicer workflow if I could edit content >>> in an ordinary TW and then explode + cook new index.html. Is there >>> currently such a feature? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Yakov. >>> >>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Jeremy. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Yakov. >>>> >>>> четверг, 25 января 2018 г., 1:31:16 UTC+3 пользователь Yakov написал: >>>>> >>>>> So, regarding classic.tiddlywiki.com.. >>>>> >>>>> Is it correct that editing it can be done by just (forking and) >>>>> cloning the [1] repo and editing TW in a browser? (and pushing back to >>>>> fork >>>>> and merging) I mean are recipes at [2] outdated since TiddlySpace is down >>>>> (so [2] now has nothing to do with [1] and classic.tiddlywiki.com)? >>>>> >>>>> No, wait, this can't be. First, TW version won't be updated this way >>>>> (as well as the download package). Second, which is more surprising, for >>>>> now I have only cloned [2] and still got cooked/2.9.1/index.html with >>>>> classic.tiddlywiki.com's content in it once I've cooked TW.. is >>>>> content from [1] accounted at all? >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions? What's the correct workflow? Yeah, the last change >>>>> was done back in 2013, so it won't surprise me if nobody remembers... >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Yakov. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki.github.com >>>>> [2] https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki.com/ >>>>> >>>>> среда, 24 января 2018 г., 17:56:27 UTC+3 пользователь PMario написал: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 2:09:11 PM UTC+1, Yakov wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS is that correct that the upstream name is purely a convention >>>>>>> and git doesn't do anything different with regard to it, technically? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes ... All aliases are just a convention. ... If you use the same >>>>>> schema for all your local repos, it helps to minify "user errors" >>>>>> >>>>>> For me "push origin" means ... I can savely write to it. >>>>>> >>>>>> "push upstream" means ... Be really carefull ... Messing it up, will >>>>>> cause a lot of work to fix it! >>>>>> >>>>>> -m >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to tiddlywikide...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddly...@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/6f29491c-ab84-4b9e-8e89-2058cd6a93b9%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/6f29491c-ab84-4b9e-8e89-2058cd6a93b9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7194006e-69a6-4a4a-a6de-03afc9804a67%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
