Ciao Mat Broadly agree with PMario on this for modest customisation within standard TW content type. Not least because the mechanism is there for handing open and closing changes already for custom styles. That said, I could imagine a "custom pragma" that user can add to might be worth thinking about. Decent pragma have a bit more intelligence than just substitution. Lists, for instance, need to faultlessly handle nesting.
In a way, the issue partly devolves on how far you want to go with custom styling elements. Personally I use BJ's variant pre-parser tool that enables regex to insert any manner of changes in HTML or CSS before render. That, for me, is for specific needs for laying out screenplays. But that would be overkill for more modest changes in normal type tiddlers. Thoughts TT On Thursday, 27 August 2020 18:01:13 UTC+2, PMario wrote: > > Hi Mat, > > IMO it will be hard to use the (paragraph) § sing as a start or end of > special markup. .. It's way to common in "law related" texts. eg: § has a > meaning on its own. Same is true for §§. So we will need at least 3 of them > to start or end with. ... > > IMO it will be very similar or the same as: > https://tiddlywiki.com/#Styles%20and%20Classes%20in%20WikiText > > -mario > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/79f63ef7-1699-4c30-9545-e08e0309386bo%40googlegroups.com.
