On Thursday, 27 August 2020 23:53:53 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > Eric Shulman wrote: >> >> Using this code to control formatting would preclude using it as a >> printable character in legal texts. >> > > Good then that my proposal is for "custom markup", as defined by the user, > and not predefined markup. As noted in the OP, if no styling etc is defined > then using the character doesn't "do" anything. >
In any case, if constructed through a proper pragma then it should be possible to de-activate the behaviour using \rules for specific Tiddlers. > > Mat: Any thoughts on the OP (with the goal of simplifying authoring)? > The principle of the OP has been hashed over a bunch of times. BJ long ago made an entire system in three variants to get control of parsing. His approach is maybe worth looking at, I think, to basically grasp how to do it. Then apply to standard content type. TonyM has asked about this a bunch of times. Some of the discussions with him are informative. IF you want to have links to TM or BJs stuff let me know (could take some time). But maybe you know all this already. So, the most robust method would likely be a new pragma that has config options for (a) character choice (b) basic behaviour. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/a5f3f08d-87a0-4897-a0fb-8b643abaf258o%40googlegroups.com.
