PMario wrote: You *have to start* the line with a "tick" or an "angel" quote, except > someone comes up with a better character that we don't use already! The > parser needs it.
My point was not to use dot as the indicator but instead use *the full string* (that includes the dot) as indicator. And it doesn't have to be a dot prefix, it can be some other keyboard-accessible prefix (maybe _ or - ). The point with the prefix character is ONLY to make it "stick out" so the user (not the parser) doesn't mistake it for regular text. In other words, the indicator would not be one indicator but *several* indicators such as _D or _DETAILS or _details _S or _SUMMARY or _summary ...or, for that matter... -§ These indicator strings would bring with them, i.e cause, a *default* styling (which, if I understand it right, the tick char or angle quote do not, by themselves). The default styles can be overwritten by the user, just like any other styles. *Only a few such indicators are needed* assuming they trigger a styling which can also be user customized. But I guess it is also neat if one can chain on additional suffixing classes like in your examples. The simple case though, comparable to adding a bullet, is only a single "_D" or "-§" indicator because these are directly available on everyones keyboard. Do I misunderstand something? Is this not possible? You have to agree this would be superiorly simple to use. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/6c5827a2-476e-4e70-b741-37fe8cd8e3fao%40googlegroups.com.
