TonyM wrote:
>
> I can confirm this "chain atomic styles" already works
>
I did not realize this worked beyond @@ in native TW. Thank you!
However note the gap we are addressing here is allowing such cascaded
> classnames to be placed at the front of any line
Yes, I have to assume we're all clear on that point. My main point, in the
latter posts, are that if the "indicator" can be a distinctive string
rather than only a single character, then we don't need ticks or angle
quotes. My interpretation is that the system *can *deal with
multi-character indicators such as @@.
Possibly relevant is that *tags in HTML5 can be arbitrary *e.g <pretty>
which is then styled like other tags, i.e no prefixing dot, e.g
pretty {background:red}
...and my interpretation is that TW converts e.g an asterisk * into <li>
which in turn applies natively defined styling ...so shouldn't it be
possible to turn, say, "_P" or "_PRETTY" into <pretty> which can apply
other styling? I.e we don't have to adapt to the limited set of predefined
HTML tags.
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/fb647e07-ff87-482e-8914-94e79f4089eao%40googlegroups.com.
