On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:16:00 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: ... > *My approach feeding of both your ideas.* > > If you had *only one appropriate "escape" character *you can code > multiple behaviours by what you provide after that. An escape character is > more reliable if people cant normally enter it via the keyboard, but a > custom shortcut can insert any character and editor toolbar buttons can > simplify this. > > - Perhaps not with the proposed tick and angle brackets, I would like > to see the ability to > - escape character, provide html tag name (any name eg; div, p, even > PRETTY) then allow a one or more .classnames > - Eg using the aforementioned § > - §htmltag.classname.classname<space> > - Or if no tag is provided default to div (because p is a trivial > alternative) > - §.classname.classname<space> > - §<space> would wrap from beginning of line to \n in a div > - §p<space> would wrap from beginning of line to \n in a p > > Hi folks, It is possible to create names like this. ... BUT it's not implemented that way atm.
At the moment I'm using: #1 ´.name.classname.classnameText can directly start here ... or ´Text can start here. Which is a little bit inconsistent. I know. ------------------------ IF we use: #2 ´name.classname.classname There has to be a space after the indicator and class definitions. ´ Like so. Even if there is no name there has to be a space, otherwise the "Like" will be "eaten" What do you think? #1 or #2? -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7ea481fe-5bd6-4cf0-81cd-d78985aa60e5o%40googlegroups.com.
