PMario wrote: > > My main point is, that I don't what to deal with the unicode support > problems. The advanced usecase of the plugin is difficult enough to > explain. >
Right. In any case the DEFAULT glyphs in the standard plugin I hope are finite in number and (pretty sure to be) in fonts on ALL machines. Otherwise, as you say, it could become a support nightmare of missing fonts. With at least some of them on KEYBOARD, so much the better too. My interest in exploring Unicode is ... -- IF you ever allowed a method to allow advanced users to define IDs. :-) -- I think it could be VERY useful to be able to do so. But note I also agree with TonyM that *there is more font support than we perhaps realise*. The PROBLEM is to have a robust method to precisely determine what Unicode characters are UNIVERSALLY SUPPORTED. My thoughts TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/24bee47a-9bd5-47e2-beb3-82b8e7394490n%40googlegroups.com.
